Artificial intelligence is no longer something young people encounter only in technology classes or discussions about the future. It is already part of their everyday digital lives.

It influences what appears on social media feeds, the information suggested by search engines, the content recommended by online platforms and, increasingly, the tools used for studying, writing, creating images, communicating and making decisions. Generative AI has made this presence even more visible: young people can now interact directly with systems capable of producing text, images, ideas and recommendations in seconds.

Being able to use these tools, however, is only one part of being digitally competent.

The more important question is whether young people can understand what these systems are doing, recognise their limitations, evaluate their outputs critically and decide when — and when not — to rely on them.

This is where AI literacy becomes part of active citizenship.

AI is already part of young people’s digital lives

Young people are often described as “digital natives”, but familiarity with technology does not automatically mean understanding it.

Someone may spend hours every day on social media without knowing why particular posts appear in their feed. They may use an AI chatbot effectively without understanding where its answers come from. They may produce content using generative AI without considering copyright, accuracy, transparency or the data they are sharing.

AI literacy therefore goes beyond knowing how to operate a digital tool.

It means developing the ability to ask questions such as:

  • Who created this system, and for what purpose?
  • What information might have been used to train it?
  • Can its answer be inaccurate, incomplete or biased?
  • What happens to the information I provide?
  • How is an algorithm influencing what I see online?
  • Should I trust this result, or verify it elsewhere?
  • What responsibilities do I have when I use AI-generated content?

These are technical questions, but they are also social and civic ones.

Misinformation, bias and privacy: learning to question digital information

One of the most important dimensions of AI literacy is the ability to evaluate information critically.

Generative AI can produce convincing texts, images and videos at unprecedented speed. At the same time, automated systems can reproduce inaccuracies, amplify stereotypes or present misleading information with considerable confidence.

For young people navigating an already crowded information environment, the challenge is therefore not simply accessing information. It is judging its reliability.

This requires practical habits: checking sources, comparing information, recognising manipulation, distinguishing evidence from opinion and understanding that an AI-generated answer is not automatically a verified answer.

Bias poses another challenge.

AI systems learn from data created by societies, and those data may contain inequalities, omissions and stereotypes. As a result, algorithmic systems may reproduce or reinforce existing patterns rather than provide genuinely neutral results.

Recognising this helps young people move from passive acceptance to critical engagement.

Privacy is equally important. Every digital interaction may involve data: searches, locations, preferences, images, personal information or behavioural patterns. Using AI responsibly therefore includes understanding what information is appropriate to share, how platforms may process it and why protecting personal data matters.

AI literacy, in this sense, is closely connected to digital safety, autonomy and informed decision-making.

AI literacy is also a future skill

The ability to work critically with digital technologies is becoming increasingly relevant to education and employment.

Young people entering the labour market will encounter AI not only in technology-related professions but across many different sectors. Content creation, communication, administration, research, marketing, education, data analysis and project management are already changing as AI-assisted tools become more common.

Preparing for this environment does not mean teaching young people to depend on AI.

It means helping them understand how to combine technology with distinctly human competences: critical thinking, creativity, communication, ethical judgment, collaboration and problem-solving.

Knowing how to formulate a useful prompt may be valuable. Knowing how to assess the answer is more valuable.

Being able to generate content quickly may save time. Being able to determine whether that content is accurate, appropriate, inclusive and ethically produced is what transforms a technical ability into a professional competence.

For this reason, AI literacy and employability are increasingly connected. Future-ready young people need not only digital tools, but the judgment required to use them effectively and responsibly.

From digital users to digital citizens

The implications go beyond employment.

Digital environments have become important spaces for public discussion, access to information, community building and democratic participation.

Young people encounter political messages online. They participate in campaigns and social movements. They discuss social issues through digital platforms. They may create and distribute content capable of reaching audiences far beyond their immediate communities.

AI increasingly affects all of these processes.

Algorithms influence which voices become visible. Automated systems can accelerate the circulation of misleading information. Generative tools can support creativity and participation, but can also be used to produce manipulation, impersonation or large quantities of unreliable content.

Understanding these dynamics is therefore part of learning how to participate responsibly in democratic life.

Active digital citizenship means being able to make informed choices, challenge misleading information, communicate respectfully, recognise discrimination and participate constructively in digital communities.

It also means recognising that technology is not something that simply happens to society. Citizens can question how technology is designed, debate how it should be used and participate in decisions about the digital environments they want to live in.

AI literacy consequently becomes a question not only of what technology can do, but also of what we want technology to do and under which conditions.

How AIDA connects these dimensions

This connection between digital competence, critical thinking and citizenship is at the centre of AIDA – AI for All: Empowering Digital Citizens.

AIDA is an Erasmus+ Virtual Exchanges project bringing together organisations from Greece, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Italy. Its aim is to strengthen the digital, intercultural and civic competences of young people and youth workers by helping them engage critically and responsibly with artificial intelligence.

Rather than treating AI as an isolated technical subject, AIDA approaches it through several interconnected dimensions.

The project addresses:

  • critical digital and AI literacy;
  • misinformation and fact-checking;
  • algorithmic bias and ethical technology use;
  • privacy and data awareness;
  • digital creativity and content production;
  • employability and future-oriented skills;
  • intercultural dialogue;
  • inclusion and accessibility;
  • democratic participation and responsible citizenship.

The project begins with research and needs analysis, listening to young people, educators and organisations in order to understand skills gaps, barriers and learning needs.

These findings will inform the development of the Grow & Go online course, designed to provide accessible and interactive learning opportunities around digital skills, AI and the themes explored by the project.

AIDA will then move from learning to practice through training and virtual exchanges, where participants from different countries and backgrounds will work together on issues including inclusion and diversity, digital transformation, democratic participation, sustainability and innovative learning methodologies.

Virtual exchange is particularly important because AI and digital citizenship cannot be understood only from one national or cultural perspective. Technology crosses borders, but experiences of technology are shaped by different languages, educational systems, social contexts and opportunities.

Creating spaces where young people can compare these experiences is therefore part of developing both digital competence and intercultural understanding.

Learning to shape the digital future

AI literacy should not be understood as an additional specialist skill reserved for programmers or technology professionals.

It is increasingly becoming a basic competence for participating in contemporary society.

Young people need to know how to use digital tools, but also how to question them. They need opportunities to experiment with AI, but also to discuss its consequences. They need skills that can support future employment, while also developing the judgment required to participate responsibly in democratic life.

The objective is not to create passive consumers of increasingly sophisticated technologies.

It is to support young people in becoming informed, critical and active digital citizens — capable of using technology creatively, recognising its risks, challenging its limitations and contributing to the kind of digital society they want to build.

That is the broader ambition behind AIDA: moving from digital skills to digital agency, and from simply using AI to understanding how to use it responsibly.

AIDA – AI for All: Empowering Digital Citizens
Project No. 101253098
Erasmus+ Virtual Exchanges in the Western Balkans
Call: ERASMUS-EDU-2025-VIRT-EXCH
Project duration: 1 February 2026 – 31 January 2029

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EACEA. Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.